Internet-Draft J. Michaud
Intended status: Informational June 24, 2016
Expires: December 26, 2016
XML Hypertext Application Language
draft-michaud-xml-hal-00
Abstract
This document proposes a media type for representing resources and
their relations with hyperlinks.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 12, 2015.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. HAL Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Resource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Reserved Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1.1. link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1.2. resource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5.1. rel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5.1. href . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.2. templated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.3. type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.4. deprecation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.5. name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.6. profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.7. title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.8. hreflang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Media Type Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7.1. profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.1. Self Link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.2. Link relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.3. Hypertext Cache Pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.4. Namespace and prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
11. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Appendix B. Frequently Asked Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
B.1. How should a client know the
meaning/structure/semantics/type of a . . . . . . . . . . 11
B.2. Where can I find libraries for working with HAL? . . . . . 11
B.3. Why does HAL have no forms? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1. Introduction
There is an emergence of non-HTML HTTP applications ("Web APIs")
which use hyperlinks to direct clients around their resources.
The XML Hypertext Application Language (HAL) is a standard which
establishes conventions for expressing hypermedia controls, such as
links, with XML [W3C.REC-xml-20081126].
HAL is a generic media type with which Web APIs can be developed and
exposed as series of links. Clients of these APIs can select links
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
by their link relation type and traverse them in order to progress
through the application.
HAL's conventions result in a uniform interface for serving and
consuming hypermedia, enabling the creation of general-purpose
libraries that can be re-used on any API utilizing HAL.
The primary design goals of HAL are generality and simplicity. HAL
can be applied to many different domains, and imposes the minimal
amount of structure necessary to cover the key requirements of a
hypermedia Web API.
2. Requirements
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. HAL Documents
A HAL Document uses the format described in [W3C.REC-xml-20081126]
and has the media type "application/hal+xml".
Its root MUST be a resource element.
For example:
GET /orders/523 HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org
Accept: application/hal+xml
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/hal+xml
USDshipped10.20
Here, we have a HAL document representing an order resource with the
URI "/orders/523". It has "warehouse" and "invoice" links, and its
own state in the form of "currency", "status", and "total" elements.
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
4. Resource
The resource element represents a Resource and SHOULD also host the
set of attributes that describe a Link (as defined by [RFC5988]). See
Section 5. and Section 8.1. for details.
It has two reserved elements:
(1) "link": a link to another resource.
(2) "resource": an embedded resource.
Everything else MUST be valid XML and represents the current state of
the Resource.
4.1. Reserved Elements
4.1.1. link
The reserved "link" element is OPTIONAL.
This element MAY be used to host the set of attributes that describe
a Link (as defined by [RFC5988]). See Section 5. for details.
4.1.2. resource
The reserved "resource" element is OPTIONAL
If present, this element MUST observe the same constraints defined
for the root resource but MUST additionally host a Link so that
embedded resources can more easily be identified when processed.
Embedded resources MAY be a full, partial, or inconsistent version of
the representation served from the target URI.
5. Link
A Link is defined as a set of attributes that represent a hyperlink
from the containing resource to a URI. The attributes are as follows:
5.1. rel
The "rel" attribute is REQUIRED.
It is an attribute whose relation values are link relation types (as
defined by [RFC5988]).
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
5.1. href
The "href" attribute is REQUIRED.
Its value is either a URI [RFC3986] or a URI Template [RFC6570].
If the value is a URI Template then the Link SHOULD have a
"templated" attribute whose value is true.
5.2. templated
The "templated" attribute is OPTIONAL.
Its value is boolean (as defined by [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028])
and SHOULD be true when the Link's "href" attribute is a URI
Template.
Its value SHOULD be considered false if the attribute is absent.
5.3. type
The "type" attribute is OPTIONAL.
Its value is a string used as a hint to indicate the media type
expected when dereferencing the target resource.
5.4. deprecation
The "deprecation" attribute is OPTIONAL.
Its presence indicates that the link is to be deprecated (i.e.
removed) at a future date. Its value is a URL that SHOULD provide
further information about the deprecation.
A client SHOULD provide some notification (e.g. by logging a warning
message) whenever it traverses over a link that has this attribute.
The notification SHOULD include the deprecation attribute's value so
that a client maintainer can easily find information about the
deprecation.
5.5. name
The "name" attribute is OPTIONAL.
Its value MAY be used as a secondary key for selecting Links which
share the same relation type.
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
5.6. profile
The "profile" attribute is OPTIONAL.
Its value is a string which is a URI that hints about the profile (as
defined by [RFC6906]) of the target resource.
5.7. title
The "title" attribute is OPTIONAL.
Its value is a string and is intended for labeling the link with a
human-readable identifier (as defined by [RFC5988]).
5.8. hreflang
The "hreflang" attribute is OPTIONAL.
Its value is a string and is intended for indicating the language of
the target resource (as defined by [RFC5988]).
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
6. Example
The following is an example representing a list of orders
GET /orders HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org
Accept: application/hal+xml
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/hal+xml
30.00USDshipped20.00USDprocessing1420
Here, the order list document provides a "next" link directing to the
next page, and a "find" link containing a URI Template which can be
expanded with an 'id' variable to go directly to a specific order.
It also has two embedded resources, "order". Each of these has its
own links to the associated "basket" and "customer" resources, and
properties showing their "total", "currency" and "status".
Additionally, the order list resource has its own properties
"currentlyProcessing" and "shippedToday".
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
7. Media Type Parameters
7.1. profile
The media type identifier application/hal+xml MAY also include an
additional "profile" parameter (as defined by [RFC6906])
HAL documents that are served with the "profile" parameter still
SHOULD include a "profile" link belonging to the root resource.
8. Recommendations
8.1. Self Link
Each Resource SHOULD have a 'self' link that corresponds with the
IANA registered 'self' relation (as defined by [RFC5988]) and whose
target is the resource's URI.
8.2. Link relations
Custom link relation types (Extension Relation Types in [RFC5988])
SHOULD be URIs that when dereferenced in a web browser provide
relevant documentation, in the form of an HTML page, about the
meaning and/or behavior of the target Resource. This will improve
the discoverability of the API.
The CURIE Syntax [W3C.NOTE-curie-20101216] MAY be used for brevity
for these URIs. CURIEs are established within a HAL document via XML
namespace on the root Resource.
The above demonstrates the relation "http://a.com/rels/widgets" being
abbreviated to "acme:widgets" via CURIE syntax.
8.3. Hypertext Cache Pattern
The "hypertext cache pattern" allows servers to use embedded
resources to dynamically reduce the number of requests a client
makes, improving the efficiency and performance of the application.
Clients MAY be automated for this purpose so that, for any given link
relation, they will read from an embedded resource (if present) in
preference to traversing a link.
To activate this client behavior for a given link, servers SHOULD add
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
an embedded resource into the representation with the same relation.
Servers SHOULD NOT entirely "swap out" a link for an embedded
resource (or vice versa) because client support for this technique is
OPTIONAL.
The following examples shows the hypertext cache pattern applied to
an "author" link:
Before:
After:
Alan WattsJanuary 6, 1915November 16, 1973
8.4. Namespace and prefix
The default namespace of "http://stateless.co/hal/ns" SHOULD be used
to allow for mixed, and potentially conflicting, xml vocabularies to
coexist in the same xml instance (e.g. embedding an
application/hal+xml payload in another xml).
If a namespace prefix is needed, "hal" MAY be used by default.
9. Security Considerations
TBD
10. IANA Considerations
TBD
11. Normative References
[RFC6906] Wilde, E., "The 'profile' Link Relation Type", RFC 6906,
March 2013.
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC
3986, January 2005.
[W3C.REC-xml-20081126]
Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C. M., Maler, E.,
Yergeau, F., "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth
Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium REC REC-xml-20081126,
November 2008, .
[RFC5988] Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 5988, October 2010.
[RFC6570] Gregorio, J., Fielding, R., Hadley, M., Nottingham, M.,
and D. Orchard, "URI Template", RFC 6570, March 2012.
[W3C.NOTE-curie-20101216]
McCarron, S. and M. Birbeck, "CURIE Syntax 1.0", World
Wide Web Consortium NOTE NOTE-curie-20101216, December
2010, .
[W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028]
Biron, P. V., Malhotra, A., "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium REC REC-
xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004,
.
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Mike Kelly for making this specification possible through
the creation of HAL and the hal+json specification.
I would also like to thank folks on the Hal Discuss Google group for
providing feedback for the draft.
The author takes all responsibility for errors and omissions.
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft XML Hypertext Application Language June 24, 2016
Appendix B. Frequently Asked Questions
B.1. How should a client know the meaning/structure/semantics/type of a
resource?
There are two main approaches to solving this problem. Both involve
exposing additional documentation describing the resource which may
be human and/or machine readable (e.g. an HTML page, an XML Schema,
an ALPS profile, etc.). The difference between the two approaches is
in where that URI is shared with the client, which is either:
(1) The relation documentation associated to a Link relation type.
(2) A 'profile' (via a Link's profile attribute or via a Link with a
'profile' relation type).
B.2. Where can I find libraries for working with HAL?
A list of libraries is maintained here:
http://stateless.co/hal_specification.html
B.3. Why does HAL have no forms?
Omitting forms from HAL was an intentional design decision that was
made to keep it focused on linking for APIs. HAL is therefore a good
candidate for use as a base media type on which to build more complex
capabilities.
Author's Address
Jeff Michaud
Email: cometaj2@comcast.net
Twitter: @cometaj2
Michaud Expires December 26, 2016 [Page 11]